User talk:Uewnjjfrvf

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ronald McDonald has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ronald McDonald was changed by Uewnjjfrvf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963192 on 2017-10-04T23:47:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hannah Weiner. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hannah Weiner was changed by Uewnjjfrvf (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961548 on 2017-10-04T23:49:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hannah Weiner, you may be blocked from editing. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 23:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your three blank unblock requests. Please review the guide to appealing blocks before making another request. If you keep making disruptive edits to this talk page, you could lose the ability to edit it as well. —C.Fred (talk) 00:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]